Skip to content
Campus Alert Archive
ASU

Yik Yak bomb claims evacuated three buildings overnight; three students arrested

AI-generated · every claim is source-linked
AZbomb threatemergency notificationhigh confidence
Confirmed HoaxDetermined to be a hoax. The institutional response is documented because it reveals how the alert system performed under a perceived real threat.

Shortly before 9:30 p.m. MST on September 12, 2022, Arizona State University Police received reports of multiple Yik Yak posts claiming bombs had been placed in the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residence Hall. The posts escalated into a bizarre one-upmanship: one student wrote 'I put the bomb in the MU,' another replied 'No, I put the bomb in the MU,' and a third chimed in 'It's OK guys we all put the bomb in the MU.' The MU, Hassayampa Academic Village, and Barrett Residential Complex were evacuated and swept overnight; no items of concern were found. Three students were arrested and charged with a felony and four misdemeanors each.

Alerts
2
Response
Killed
Injured
Institution
Arizona State University
Public R1 · AZ
All ASU cases →
~83,000 studentsASU Alert
Official alert policy
Read when and how ASU says it will use ASU Alert: summarized, quoted, and analyzed.
Documented Timeline

Alert Sequence

2 messages in sequence · 2 verified verbatim

Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.

INITIAL ALERTTwitter/X
Verified verbatim170 chars
POLICE SITUATION - Tempe campus ASUPD is working a Police Situation at the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls. Stay clear of the area until further notice.
Exact text from official @ASUPolice X status 1569560809982013440 including line breaks.
ALL CLEARTwitter/X+2h 55m
Verified verbatim120 chars
FINAL UPDATE - Tempe campus All incidents cleared. No items found. All campus activity is cleared to return to normal.
Verbatim full text from official @ASUPolice X final update status 1569604902057558017.
Preserves "No items found" and campus-return language exactly.
Message elements

How the first alert is built

To check this alert, Claude (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

POLICE SITUATION - Tempe campus ASUPD is working a Police Situation at the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls. Stay clear of the area until further notice.

  • Sourcepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous: 'ASUPD' identifies the responding police department.

    Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: 'ASUPD is working a Police Situation'
    2. present: ASUPD, Arizona State University Police Department, is named as sender.
    3. present: 'ASUPD is working a Police Situation'
    4. present: 'ASUPD' identifies the responding/issuing agency.
    5. present: 'ASUPD' named
    6. present: 'ASUPD is working a Police Situation'.
    7. present: Signed 'ASUPD'.
    8. present: 'ASUPD is working a Police Situation' names the responding authority.
    9. present: 'ASUPD is working a Police Situation'
    10. present: 'ASUPD' named as responding authority.
    11. present: ASUPD
    12. present: 'ASUPD' identifies the responding police department.
    13. present: 'ASUPD' named as responding police department.
    14. present: Signed "ASUPD" (Arizona State University Police Dept).
    15. present: 'ASUPD is working a Police Situation'
    16. present: 'ASUPD is working a Police Situation'.
    17. present: Signed 'ASUPD'
    18. present: 'ASUPD' names the responding agency.
    19. present: 'ASUPD is working' identifies responding authority.
    20. present: Named agency "ASUPD".
    21. present: 'ASUPD' named as responding authority.
    22. present: 'ASUPD' named as responding agency.
    23. present: 'ASUPD' identified as responding agency/source.
    24. present: ASUPD named
    25. present: 'ASUPD' named as source.
  • Hazardabsent0/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous: 'Police Situation' is a generic label with no specific hazard type named.

    What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. absent: Only 'Police Situation', no specific hazard named
    2. absent: Only says police situation, a generic term with no specific hazard.
    3. absent: 'Police Situation' does not name a specific hazard
    4. absent: Only 'Police Situation' described, no specific hazard named.
    5. absent: Only 'Police Situation', no specific hazard named
    6. absent: 'Police Situation' is generic, no specific hazard named.
    7. absent: Only 'Police Situation' named, no specific hazard type.
    8. absent: 'Police Situation' is generic, does not name a specific hazard.
    9. absent: 'Police Situation' is generic, no specific hazard named
    10. absent: Only 'Police Situation' named, no specific hazard type given.
    11. absent: Police Situation is generic, not a specific named hazard
    12. absent: 'Police Situation' is generic, no specific hazard named.
    13. absent: 'Police Situation' is generic, no specific hazard named.
    14. absent: "Police Situation" is generic, not a specific named hazard.
    15. absent: Only 'Police Situation' named, no specific hazard
    16. absent: Only 'Police Situation', no specific hazard named.
    17. absent: Only 'Police Situation', no specific hazard named
    18. absent: 'Police Situation' is generic, no specific threat type named.
    19. absent: Only 'Police Situation', no specific hazard named.
    20. absent: Only generic "Police Situation", no specific hazard named.
    21. absent: Only 'Police Situation' given, no specific hazard named.
    22. absent: Only 'Police Situation' used, no specific hazard named.
    23. absent: 'Police Situation' is a generic term, no specific hazard named.
    24. absent: 'Police situation' is generic, no specific hazard named
    25. absent: 'Police Situation' is generic, no specific hazard type named.
  • Locationpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls' names the specific location.

    Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls'
    2. present: Names Memorial Union, Hassayampa Residential Halls, and Tempe campus.
    3. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls'
    4. present: Names 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls'.
    5. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls'
    6. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls'.
    7. present: Gives 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls'.
    8. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls' names the location.
    9. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls'
    10. present: Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls named.
    11. present: Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls, Tempe campus
    12. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls' give location.
    13. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls' given.
    14. present: "Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls".
    15. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls'
    16. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls'.
    17. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls'
    18. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls' on Tempe campus.
    19. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls'.
    20. present: Specifies "Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls".
    21. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls' name location.
    22. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls'.
    23. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls' given.
    24. present: Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls, Tempe campus
    25. present: 'Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls.'
  • Guidancepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice' is direct guidance.

    The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice'
    2. present: Instructs recipients to stay clear of the area.
    3. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice'
    4. present: Instructs to 'Stay clear of the area until further notice'.
    5. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice'
    6. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice'.
    7. present: Instructs to 'Stay clear of the area'.
    8. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice'.
    9. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice'
    10. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice'.
    11. present: Stay clear of the area until further notice
    12. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice' instructs recipients.
    13. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice'.
    14. present: "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    15. present: 'Stay clear of the area'
    16. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice'.
    17. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice'
    18. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice'.
    19. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice.'
    20. present: Instructs "Stay clear of the area".
    21. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice' is guidance.
    22. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice'.
    23. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice'.
    24. present: Stay clear of the area
    25. present: 'Stay clear of the area until further notice.'
  • Timepresent18/25

    Final assessment

    A clear majority credit 'until further notice' as conveying ongoing recency/status, though a sizable minority felt it lacks a real clock time or date; the majority view of at least a timing signal wins.

    When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: 'until further notice' conveys ongoing status
    2. present: Says stay clear until further notice.
    3. absent: No clock time or recency marker given
    4. absent: No clock time or date given.
    5. absent: No clock time or recency marker
    6. present: 'until further notice' conveys ongoing status.
    7. present: Says 'until further notice'.
    8. present: 'until further notice' conveys recency.
    9. present: 'until further notice'
    10. present: 'until further notice' conveys ongoing recency.
    11. present: until further notice
    12. present: 'until further notice' conveys ongoing recency.
    13. present: 'until further notice' conveys duration.
    14. present: "until further notice" conveys ongoing recency.
    15. absent: No clock time or recency word given
    16. absent: No clock time or date given.
    17. present: 'until further notice'
    18. present: 'until further notice' conveys ongoing status.
    19. present: 'until further notice' conveys ongoing status.
    20. absent: No clock time or date given.
    21. present: 'until further notice' conveys ongoing timing.
    22. present: 'until further notice' conveys ongoing status.
    23. present: 'until further notice' conveys ongoing timing.
    24. absent: No time reference given
    25. present: 'until further notice' conveys ongoing recency.
  • Impactabsent0/25

    Final assessment

    Unanimous: no stated harm, severity, or consequence is conveyed.

    What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. absent: No stated consequence
    2. absent: No description of potential harm or severity is given.
    3. absent: No stated harm or severity
    4. absent: No stated consequence conveyed.
    5. absent: No stated harm or severity conveyed
    6. absent: No stated consequence or severity described.
    7. absent: No stated consequence or severity.
    8. absent: No stated potential harm since no specific hazard is named.
    9. absent: No stated consequence or severity
    10. absent: No stated consequence given.
    11. absent: No stated consequence given
    12. absent: No stated consequence given.
    13. absent: No stated harm or severity described.
    14. absent: No stated harm or severity.
    15. absent: No stated consequence
    16. absent: No stated consequence.
    17. absent: No stated consequence given
    18. absent: No stated consequence or severity.
    19. absent: No stated harm or severity.
    20. absent: No stated consequence or severity.
    21. absent: No stated consequence or severity described.
    22. absent: No stated harm or severity conveyed.
    23. absent: No stated consequence or severity.
    24. absent: No stated consequence
    25. absent: No stated harm or severity conveyed.

Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.

About this analysis
Context

Background

On the evening of September 12, 2022, a series of anonymous Yik Yak posts claiming bombs had been placed set off a costly overnight bomb scare at Arizona State University. According to court documents cited by the Arizona State Press, 21-year-old Trevor Benoit wrote 'I put the bomb in the MU' on Yik Yak; 18-year-old Lukas Patton replied 'No, I put the bomb in the MU' and subsequently added 'It's OK guys we all put the bomb in the MU'; 18-year-old Peter Fraenkel also posted a threat referencing Hassayampa. The posts triggered a multi-building evacuation of the Memorial Union (ASU's main student center) plus Hassayampa Academic Village and the Barrett Residential Complex. ASU Police, Tempe Police, and Chandler Police deployed K-9 units and swept the buildings overnight; no threats were found. All three students were arrested and charged with a felony count of interference/disruption of an educational institution and four misdemeanor charges. ASU is among the largest universities in the United States by enrollment, and the Memorial Union is a hub for tens of thousands of students, making the evacuation disruptive. The case is notable for illustrating how Yik Yak's relaunch created an environment where users underestimated law enforcement's ability to trace their posts.
Outcome
No explosives found. Evacuation lasted overnight into September 13. Three students (Lukas Patton, 18; Peter Fraenkel, 18; and Trevor Benoit, 21) were arrested and charged with felony interference/disruption of an educational institution and four misdemeanor counts each.
Provenance

Sources

Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.

  1. News
  2. Student Paper
  3. News
  4. News
  5. Student Paper
  6. Social
  7. Social
Cite this case

Campus Alert Archive. "Arizona State University: Yik Yak bomb claims evacuated three buildings overnight; three students arrested." Incident of September 12, 2022. Added May 2026; last updated July 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/arizona-state-university-yikyak-bomb-threat-2022-09-12/

Download case JSON

Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.

Tags
bomb-threatyik-yaksocial-media-threatstudent-suspectarrest-madearizonatempepublic-r1anonymous-appmulti-agency-responseevening-threatHoax
Added May 2026Updated July 2026Via ingestion