A bomb threat empties a student-services building for two hours before an all-clear
AI-generated · every claim is source-linkedOn the morning of September 23, 2015, Purdue University Police responded to a bomb threat at Schleman Hall of Student Services, an academic-services building on Purdue's West Lafayette campus. Police and fire crews arrived around 11:45 AM CDT, evacuated the building, and conducted a two-hour sweep. PurdueALERT messages directed students and staff to avoid the building and follow shelter instructions. After roughly two hours, no explosive device was located and the building was reopened.
- Alerts
- 3
- Response
- 5 min
- Killed
- —
- Injured
- —
Alert Sequence
3 messages in sequence · 3 verified verbatim
Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.
How the first alert is built
To check this alert, Claude (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.
Bomb threat reported at Purdue WL - Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive); avoid the area; check http://purdue.edu/ea for updates
Sourceabsent1/25
Final assessment
Strong majority (23 of 24): no sender or authority is named, only a passive 'reported' construction; one dissenting read treated 'Purdue WL' as identifying the institution, but nearly all reads found no explicit source.
Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.
See all 25 individual reads
- absent: No sender or authority identified in the text.
- present: 'Purdue WL' names the institution as sender.
- absent: No sender or authority identified, only that a threat was reported.
- absent: No sender identified, only a passive report of a bomb threat.
- absent: No sender or authority identified explicitly.
- absent: No sender or agency named in the text.
- absent: No sender or authority identified, just a report of the threat.
- absent: No sender or authority named, only 'check purdue.edu/ea'.
- absent: No sender or authority identified, only that a threat was 'reported'.
- absent: No sender or agency identified, only where to check updates.
- absent: No sender/authority named, only describes the threat itself.
- absent: No sender/authority identified, only 'reported at'.
- absent: No sender/authority named, only passive 'reported at'.
- absent: No specific sender or agency identified, only implied 'Purdue' via context.
- absent: No specific agency or sender named.
- absent: No sender/authority named, only 'Bomb threat reported'.
- absent: No sender or authority identified, only that a threat was 'reported'.
- absent: No sender/authority named, just 'Bomb threat reported'.
- absent: No sender or authority explicitly named.
- absent: No sender or authority identified, only a link to purdue.edu.
- absent: No sender/authority named, only that a threat was reported.
- absent: No sender/authority named, just a report of a threat.
- absent: No sender or agency identified for the report.
- absent: No sending authority or agency identified, only the location name.
- absent: No sender identified, only 'Purdue WL' as campus location context.
Hazardpresent25/25
Final assessment
Unanimous: 'Bomb threat' names the specific hazard explicitly.
What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: 'Bomb threat' names the specific hazard.
- present: 'Bomb threat' is explicitly named.
- present: 'Bomb threat' names the specific hazard.
- present: Names 'Bomb threat' as the specific hazard.
- present: 'Bomb threat reported' names the specific threat.
- present: 'Bomb threat reported' names the specific hazard.
- present: 'Bomb threat' explicitly named.
- present: 'Bomb threat reported' names hazard.
- present: 'Bomb threat' names the specific hazard.
- present: 'Bomb threat' names the specific threat.
- present: Names 'Bomb threat' as the specific hazard.
- present: Names 'Bomb threat' specifically.
- present: 'Bomb threat' names the specific hazard.
- present: 'Bomb threat' names the specific hazard.
- present: 'Bomb threat reported' names the hazard.
- present: 'Bomb threat' names the specific hazard.
- present: Names 'Bomb threat' as the specific hazard.
- present: 'Bomb threat' names the specific hazard.
- present: 'Bomb threat' names the specific hazard.
- present: States 'Bomb threat reported'.
- present: Names 'Bomb threat' as the specific hazard.
- present: States 'Bomb threat reported'.
- present: 'Bomb threat' names the specific hazard.
- present: 'Bomb threat' names the specific hazard.
- present: 'Bomb threat' names the specific threat.
Locationpresent25/25
Final assessment
Unanimous: 'Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' gives an exact address.
Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: 'Purdue WL - Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' gives a specific location.
- present: 'Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' is given.
- present: 'Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' gives exact location.
- present: Gives 'Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive'.
- present: 'Purdue WL - Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' gives the location.
- present: Gives 'Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive'.
- present: Names Purdue WL Schleman Hall address.
- present: 'Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive'.
- present: 'Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' gives exact location.
- present: 'Purdue WL - Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' gives exact location.
- present: Gives 'Purdue WL - Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive'.
- present: Gives 'Purdue WL - Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive'.
- present: 'Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' is a specific address.
- present: 'Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' gives exact location.
- present: 'Purdue WL - Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' gives exact location.
- present: 'Purdue WL - Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' gives exact location.
- present: Gives 'Purdue WL - Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive'.
- present: 'Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' gives exact location.
- present: 'Purdue WL - Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' gives exact location.
- present: Names 'Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive'.
- present: 'Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' given.
- present: 'Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' given.
- present: 'Purdue WL - Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' gives location.
- present: 'Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' gives the exact place.
- present: 'Schleman Hall - 475 Stadium Mall Drive' gives exact address.
Guidancepresent25/25
Final assessment
Unanimous: 'avoid the area' is an explicit protective-action instruction.
The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs a protective action.
- present: Instructs recipients to 'avoid the area'.
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs recipients.
- present: Instructs to 'avoid the area'.
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs a protective action.
- present: Instructs to 'avoid the area'.
- present: 'Avoid the area' instructs a protective action.
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs recipients.
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs a protective action.
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs a protective action.
- present: Instructs to 'avoid the area'.
- present: Instructs 'avoid the area'.
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs protective action.
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs protective action.
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs protective action.
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs protective action.
- present: Instructs to 'avoid the area'.
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs protective action.
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs protective action.
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs recipients.
- present: Instructs to 'avoid the area'.
- present: Instructs to 'avoid the area'.
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs protective action.
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs a protective action.
- present: 'avoid the area' instructs protective action.
Timeabsent0/25
Final assessment
Unanimous: no clock time, date, or recency marker is given anywhere.
When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.
See all 25 individual reads
- absent: No clock time or date given.
- absent: No clock time or date is included.
- absent: No time reference given.
- absent: No clock time or recency given.
- absent: No clock time or date given.
- absent: No clock time or recency word given.
- absent: No time or date given.
- absent: No time given.
- absent: No time reference given.
- absent: No time given.
- absent: No time or date given.
- absent: No clock time or date given.
- absent: No time given.
- absent: No time reference given.
- absent: No time or date given.
- absent: No time given.
- absent: No clock time or date given.
- absent: No time given.
- absent: No time or date reference.
- absent: No time reference given.
- absent: No clock time or recency reference given.
- absent: No clock time or recency reference.
- absent: No time or date given.
- absent: No time given.
- absent: No time or date given.
Impactabsent0/25
Final assessment
Unanimous: no consequence or severity of the bomb threat is stated beyond naming the hazard.
What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.
See all 25 individual reads
- absent: No stated consequence of the threat.
- absent: No statement of potential harm is given.
- absent: No stated consequence or severity conveyed.
- absent: No stated consequence or severity.
- absent: No stated consequence or severity.
- absent: No stated consequence.
- absent: No stated consequence beyond naming the hazard.
- absent: No consequence stated.
- absent: No stated consequence or severity.
- absent: No stated consequence.
- absent: No stated consequence beyond naming the hazard.
- absent: No stated potential harm beyond hazard name.
- absent: No stated consequence.
- absent: No stated consequence or severity.
- absent: No stated consequence or severity.
- absent: No consequence or severity stated.
- absent: No stated consequence.
- absent: No stated consequence.
- absent: No stated consequence or severity.
- absent: No stated consequence of the threat.
- absent: No stated consequence or severity of the bomb threat.
- absent: No stated consequence beyond naming the threat.
- absent: No stated consequence or severity.
- absent: No stated consequence or severity.
- absent: No stated potential harm described.
Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.
About this analysisBackground
Key Findings
Sources
Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.
- Social
- News
- Official
- Official
- Official
- Official
Campus Alert Archive. "Purdue University: A bomb threat empties a student-services building for two hours before an all-clear." Incident of September 23, 2015. Added May 2026; last updated July 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/purdue-university-schleman-hall-bomb-threat-2015-09-23/
Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.